{"content": "todo 1 next", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 32 \u2014 The mobile app's pull request may be merged once it is ready \u2014 Messages 17282 and 17283 (2026-10-06): the user gave permission to merge the pull request that builds the phone app's full feature set (to-do 3054) once it is ready, without waiting for approval. Ready means: the phone app can use every feature the desktop viewer has (checked against the design's inventory of desktop places and actions, each one marked done); three critique rounds done (rule 58); built on its own branch; the whole suite and boot guard green; and reviewed by two agents with their findings fixed, as pull request 8 was. This is the user's go for rule 61 for that one pull request only.; rule 48 \u2014 The viewer is built from its component library, and pages only\u2026 \u2014 Message 4258. Every visual piece the viewer shows more than once, or that a user would recognise as the same kind of thing (a dialog, a side panel or inspector, a dropdown, a list row, a switch, a button), is one component in web/src/kit, extracted aggressively, and every page composes those components instead of building its own copy. Before writing markup or styles in a page, look for the kit component that already does it and extend it with a prop; a second hand-built version is a bug. The side panel that animated in but not out, while a separate skill panel did both, is the example.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "law L3 \u2014 Read narrowly - grep for the line, sed a range, head the file; never\u2026 \u2014 Everything a tool returns stays in the context for good and is paid for on every turn after it. Search before you read, read the range you need, and cap output with grep, head or tail. Read a whole file only when you need all of it.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 36 \u2014 Clean, DRY, idiomatic before it is committed, never after it is\u2026 \u2014 The user should never be the one who finds duplication, dead code, a clumsy name or a pattern the codebase does not use. Read the diff before every commit as a reviewer would, and fix what is not clean then, not in a follow-up after a complaint.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 42 \u2014 Every user-facing text passes the formatters before it leaves the\u2026 \u2014 Not only a brief. A title, an abstract, an outcome and every section body are read by a person, so each goes through the same formatters on its way to the viewer \u2014 chat turns, activity items, to-do rows, inspector pages, docs alike. One field formatted out of five is not a rule, it is an accident, and it is how a raw tag ended up in the activity list after the tags feature had been stripping them for weeks. When a new field carries words a person reads, it joins the list in the same place.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 24 \u2014 An answer followed by tool calls can be missing from Claude's\u2026 \u2014 Seen 2026-09-24 for messages 9391-9404: text blocks opening with [!reply:n] that were followed by tool calls never appeared in the session's jsonl (only thinking and tool_use rows did), so the journal never saw them and the replies were lost. When a turn goes on after answering, send the answer with journal message reply <n> \"<text>\" instead of the tag.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 28 \u2014 The designer agent type exists, so design work goes to a subagent \u2014 Since 2026-10-01 .claude/agents/designer.md (Dieter, Opus, Claude Design tools, read-only on the repository) is an agent type; rule 56 says design is a subagent's job, never a helper's.; rule 58 \u2014 A design runs three critique rounds, then is built on a branch \u2014 Messages 17276 and 17281 (2026-10-06): the norm is a three-round cycle. Round by round, the designer designs (or revises), separate critic agents review the design through their lenses (the critic agent type, .claude/agents/critic.md: read-only, with a browser; one per lens, such as first-time, native, words and parity), and the designer adjusts it to their findings; three rounds in all. The three rounds stand in for the user's approval of the design: the user does not approve it. After the third round the design is built on a branch of its own, which ends in a pull request that waits for the user's approval (rule 61). Replaces message 15725's prototype approval.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 45 \u2014 No prose words as names in code - said, says, heard, spoke, told\u2026 \u2014 Messages 1360 and 1698. The user has said more than once that code must not read like prose: a variable, attribute, property or function is named for what it holds or does (text, command, labels, lines), never with a verb from a story. 'says' on the Design type (1360) and 'said = call.said.lower()' in features/recital.py (1698) are the examples. Rule 27 states the naming rule; this one carries the words, so writing one of them whispers it. Before writing a name, ask whether a reader who has never seen the code would know what it holds.; rule 59 \u2014 Every viewer heading and label says plainly what it is about \u2014 The user, messages 16499, 16839, 16844, 16989, 16992 and 16993 (2026-10-06), after 'Where the words count', 'Watch for the words in', 'This project', 'This browser' and 'Stop the journal' as tab names: viewer text reads like Linear, GitHub or Vercel. A place (page, tab, group, sidebar item) is a short noun: Settings, Project, Browser, Services, Updates, Plugins; never 'This project' or a phrase. A button is a verb for what happens: Stop, Install, Copy link, Pause the plan. A heading names what the reader looks at, and its options finish its sentence: 'Trigger when' / 'A word is written'. Plain literal words: no metaphor or whimsy ('kettle on, waiting'), no app speaking as I, none of the journal's internal words (row, hook, nudge, engine, slate). One word for one thing everywhere, sentence case, as short as it can be while clear. Applies to designers' prototypes, helpers' builds, the viewer's JavaScript lists, feature details, and shipped sequence and trigger titles alike.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the log tag does this in one step \u2014 [!log:N] makes the turn itself the log entry; it runs only when it opens the last text of your turn", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the formatter <lambda> hit an error \u2014 journal: the formatter <lambda> hit an error and kept going; the last of it is below and the whole of it is in .journal/runtime/engine.log. Fix it, then say so. engine.command_line.NotWired: no command line is wired into this process: import commands.cli at its entry", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 13 \u2014 This live session runs the installed copy in .journal/journal.pyz \u2014 The running journal (server, hooks, CLI) runs from .journal/journal.pyz with its viewer and skills in .journal/src, never from the repo. A change in the repo reaches it only through python3 src/journal.py --root .journal upgrade, which packs the zip again. A commit alone changes nothing that is running.; fact 23 \u2014 Every upgrade brings system sequences and their triggers in line\u2026 \u2014 install.py runs ship_sequences after the migrations on each upgrade, so features/sequences/shipped.py is the whole source: change its wording and the next upgrade updates every journal, no migration needed. Shipped rows carry system=True and are read-only for everyone but SYSTEM (controllers/base.py _shipped).; fact 31 \u2014 The overnight branch may be merged once every to-do is done and all\u2026 \u2014 Messages 16886 and 17009 (2026-10-06): the user said to keep working the to-do list on overnight-refactor; when every to-do item is finished and the whole suite is green, the agent may merge the pull request into main, then release a new minor version (message 17008). This is the user's go for rule 57's 'before its pull request is approved'. Until both hold, nothing of the branch goes to main except the hotfixes the user asks for.; fact 33 \u2014 Every open pull request may be merged and released once ready \u2014 The user, messages 17401 and 17402 (2026-10-06): 'see that everything is merged and deployed to main when ready'. Covers pull requests 9 (test coverage), 10 (plugins fit), 11 (voice words for helpers), the suggestion card and phone-parity: each merges once it is rebased on main, reviewed with the findings fixed, and the suite and boot guard pass; then a release goes out.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 27 \u2014 Name a declaration with the word a reader already knows \u2014 An attribute, a variable or a field gets the ordinary programming word for what it holds, not an evocative one. was, heard and alone were poetry; aliases, notify_actions and urgent_actions are what they are. The test: could a reader who has never seen this codebase guess what it holds from the name alone? Prose belongs in the help text and the abstract, where it is read as prose. This does not license abbreviations \u2014 a plain word in full, not a short one.; rule 38 \u2014 Never change the git branch until the user says so, by name \u2014 The work happens on the branch the user named. That was main until message 5929 and question 80 (2026-09-23), which moved the sins work to the branch sins. Do not create, switch to or merge any other branch unless the user names it in their own words.; rule 57 \u2014 Never merge the overnight refactor into main before its pull request\u2026 \u2014 Messages 15005, 15006, 15109, 15110 (2026-10-04): all refactor work goes on branch overnight-refactor and reaches the user as one pull request, which they read in the morning; nothing of it is merged into main until they say so. Hotfixes the user explicitly asks for go to main at once and are merged into the branch.; rule 61 \u2014 Features wait as pull requests until approved; only hotfixes merge\u2026 \u2014 Message 17118 (2026-10-06), after the overnight refactor merged as 2.252.0: start new work in a new branch, do not merge, write the pull request. Every pull request or new feature is parked until the user approves it. Hotfixes can be merged into main immediately (by a dispatched agent in a worktree of main, rule 60).", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 9 \u2014 Every public method on a controller becomes a journal command \u2014 The CLI is generated from the controllers: each public method of Controller, or of a typed controller, turns into journal <noun> <method>. A helper added to the base class therefore becomes a command on every type \u2014 which is how journal <type> handled and journal <type> refuse came to exist, from the CRUD funnel and the refusal funnel. An internal helper on a controller is named with a leading underscore, as _shaped and _status already are, or it ships as a command nobody meant.; rule 35 \u2014 Write clean code - one funnel per kind of operation, never the same\u2026 \u2014 Every kind of operation has one funnel: one method that creates, one that saves, one that refuses, one that formats. A second method that does the same thing under another name splits the behaviour, and the two drift apart. Before writing a method, search for the one that already does it and extend that. scripts/checks/funnels.py finds bodies written twice.; rule 55 \u2014 Always dispatch Codex helpers on gpt-6-sol \u2014 The user's word, message 13431: switch the codex agents to GPT-6-Sol and make it their default. ~/.codex/config.toml names it as the default model too.; rule 56 \u2014 Helpers are for work that writes; subagents read, research and design \u2014 The user, message 13464: there must be a clear distinction. A subagent can be dispatched for anything read-only: research, review, design. A helper is for actual work that writes, best in its own worktree when the work is separate. Dieter designing in Claude Design should have been a subagent, not a helper.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 1 in hand \u2014 Phone chat gaps, pin, delete, piles, terminal, commits \u2014 if this is not what you are doing, end it or park it and start the work you are in", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 32 \u2014 The mobile app's pull request may be merged once it is ready \u2014 Messages 17282 and 17283 (2026-10-06): the user gave permission to merge the pull request that builds the phone app's full feature set (to-do 3054) once it is ready, without waiting for approval. Ready means: the phone app can use every feature the desktop viewer has (checked against the design's inventory of desktop places and actions, each one marked done); three critique rounds done (rule 58); built on its own branch; the whole suite and boot guard green; and reviewed by two agents with their findings fixed, as pull request 8 was. This is the user's go for rule 61 for that one pull request only.; rule 48 \u2014 The viewer is built from its component library, and pages only\u2026 \u2014 Message 4258. Every visual piece the viewer shows more than once, or that a user would recognise as the same kind of thing (a dialog, a side panel or inspector, a dropdown, a list row, a switch, a button), is one component in web/src/kit, extracted aggressively, and every page composes those components instead of building its own copy. Before writing markup or styles in a page, look for the kit component that already does it and extend it with a prop; a second hand-built version is a bug. The side panel that animated in but not out, while a separate skill panel did both, is the example.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 the files changed since the last check (`client.js`, `todos\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 the files changed since the last check (`client.js`, `todos.py`) breaks a rule. Fix it now, at its SOURCE, while the code is still in front of you: \u00b7 \u2022 python-dict-return-bag at /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal/.claude/worktrees/main-chiara-chatwell/src/controllers/todos.py:61 \u00b7 LOAD the skill `commandments-python-value-objects` before fixing \u2014 load it even if you believe you already have. \u00b7 Run `commandments info <sin>` if a rule is not one you recognise. This check reads a file at a time, so it is not the whole picture \u2014 `judge` still is.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "law L3 \u2014 Read narrowly - grep for the line, sed a range, head the file; never\u2026 \u2014 Everything a tool returns stays in the context for good and is paid for on every turn after it. Search before you read, read the range you need, and cap output with grep, head or tail. Read a whole file only when you need all of it.; rule 47 \u2014 The journal sets itself up once, when the server starts, never per\u2026 \u2014 Messages 2220 and 2224. Discovering features and their handlers, seating the feature rows and the rename sweep happen once, at server boot, and again only when a feature is switched on or off, a plugin changes or an environment is added: features.load keeps a set-up generation per journal (SEATED) and redoes the work only when that generation moves. A command, a request or a hook uses what is already there; nothing in their path may rediscover handlers or rescan folders. A cost that repeats per call is a bug to fix, not a budget to raise.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 36 \u2014 Clean, DRY, idiomatic before it is committed, never after it is\u2026 \u2014 The user should never be the one who finds duplication, dead code, a clumsy name or a pattern the codebase does not use. Read the diff before every commit as a reviewer would, and fix what is not clean then, not in a follow-up after a complaint.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 42 \u2014 Every user-facing text passes the formatters before it leaves the\u2026 \u2014 Not only a brief. A title, an abstract, an outcome and every section body are read by a person, so each goes through the same formatters on its way to the viewer \u2014 chat turns, activity items, to-do rows, inspector pages, docs alike. One field formatted out of five is not a rule, it is an accident, and it is how a raw tag ended up in the activity list after the tags feature had been stripping them for weeks. When a new field carries words a person reads, it joins the list in the same place.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 24 \u2014 An answer followed by tool calls can be missing from Claude's\u2026 \u2014 Seen 2026-09-24 for messages 9391-9404: text blocks opening with [!reply:n] that were followed by tool calls never appeared in the session's jsonl (only thinking and tool_use rows did), so the journal never saw them and the replies were lost. When a turn goes on after answering, send the answer with journal message reply <n> \"<text>\" instead of the tag.; rule 49 \u2014 A dialog whose content grows keeps one fixed height, and its content\u2026 \u2014 Message 5361, after asking more than once: a dialog that shows output as it arrives (install, update, logs) opens at its final height and never jumps; only its content scrolls.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 the edit you just made to `PhoneDumpWork.vue` breaks a rule\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 the edit you just made to `PhoneDumpWork.vue` breaks a rule. Fix it now, at its SOURCE, while the code is still in front of you: \u00b7 \u2022 deep-data-reach at /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal/.claude/worktrees/main-chiara-chatwell/src/web/src/phone/PhoneDumpWork.vue:153 \u00b7 LOAD the skill `commandments-frontend-vue-components` before fixing \u2014 load it even if you believe you already have. \u00b7 Run `commandments info <sin>` if a rule is not one you recognise. This check reads a file at a time, so it is not the whole picture \u2014 `judge` still is.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 1 in hand \u2014 Phone chat gaps, pin, delete, piles, terminal, commits \u2014 if this is not what you are doing, end it or park it and start the work you are in", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 `PhoneDumpWork.vue`, changed since the last check, breaks a\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 `PhoneDumpWork.vue`, changed since the last check, breaks a rule. Fix it now, at its SOURCE, while the code is still in front of you: \u00b7 \u2022 deep-data-reach at /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal/.claude/worktrees/main-chiara-chatwell/src/web/src/phone/PhoneDumpWork.vue:152 \u00b7 LOAD the skill `commandments-frontend-vue-components` before fixing \u2014 load it even if you believe you already have. \u00b7 Run `commandments info <sin>` if a rule is not one you recognise. This check reads a file at a time, so it is not the whole picture \u2014 `judge` still is.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 1 in hand \u2014 Phone chat gaps, pin, delete, piles, terminal, commits \u2014 if this is not what you are doing, end it or park it and start the work you are in", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "15 facts standing, read them \u2014 9. Every public method on a controller becomes a journal command; 13. This live session runs the installed copy in .journal/journal.pyz; 18. cProfile inflates the slow-request profiles about tenfold; 20. A slim supervisor holds the agent and a worker reloads on every build; 23. Every upgrade brings system sequences and their triggers in line with the code; 24. An answer followed by tool calls can be missing from Claude's transcript; 25. A designer's install packs the whole tree, half-done server edits included; 26. Claude Code reads agent profiles when a session starts; 27. Running src/journal.py against the live .journal root starts a second server; 28. The designer agent type exists, so design work goes to a subagent; 29. Codex's transcript records the end of every exec session, polled or not; 30. The tunler server refuses TLS for any subdomain without a tunnel; 31. The overnight branch may be merged once every to-do is done and all tests pass; 32. The mobile app's pull request may be merged once it is ready; 33. Every open pull request may be merged and released once ready; 36 rules in force, read them \u2014 7. journal disable must only ever be run because the user explicitly asked for it,; 9. Research dispatched to a subagent ends in a REPORT for the user, compiled by the; 13. A title names the thing in at most 80 characters and never explains it with a co; 14. A small journal capability is a feature under features, with at most one test; 17. Do not restart the viewer for frontend-only changes; 18. Provider-specific code belongs in providers, never features; 19. Providers report facts; features decide behavior; 22. File distinct user work requests immediately; 27. Name a declaration with the word a reader already knows; 30. The viewer has one API client, and every piece of it does one job; 31. Every finding a reviewing agent reports becomes its own to-do; 35. Write clean code - one funnel per kind of operation, never the same method twice; 36. Clean, DRY, idiomatic before it is committed, never after it is complained about; 37. Close every to-do explicitly with todo done or a Journal commit trailer; 38. Never change the git branch until the user says so, by name; 39. Use only registered exclamation response tags; 40. A feature is named for what it is, never for its machinery; 41. Keep moving, run the whole suite before every commit, never wait; 42. Every user-facing text passes the formatters before it leaves the server; 43. A request or hook over its budget is fixed before the next release; 45. No prose words as names in code - said, says, heard, spoke, told, shown, became; 46. Only commit and push once the whole journal is proven to boot; 47. The journal sets itself up once, when the server starts, never per command; 48. The viewer is built from its component library, and pages only compose it; 49. A dialog whose content grows keeps one fixed height, and its content scrolls; 50. Everything the user does is doable in the viewer; 51. Every finished feature is committed, pushed and released with a new version tag; 52. A chat mark for something the user did sits on the user's side; 54. Settings and feature switches are read at boot and on change, never per call; 55. Always dispatch Codex helpers on gpt-6-sol; 56. Helpers are for work that writes; subagents read, research and design; 57. Never merge the overnight refactor into main before its pull request is approved; 58. A design runs three critique rounds, then is built on a branch; 59. Every viewer heading and label says plainly what it is about; 60. A hotfix is done by a dispatched agent in a worktree of main; 61. Features wait as pull requests until approved; only hotfixes merge at once", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 59 \u2014 Every viewer heading and label says plainly what it is about \u2014 The user, messages 16499, 16839, 16844, 16989, 16992 and 16993 (2026-10-06), after 'Where the words count', 'Watch for the words in', 'This project', 'This browser' and 'Stop the journal' as tab names: viewer text reads like Linear, GitHub or Vercel. A place (page, tab, group, sidebar item) is a short noun: Settings, Project, Browser, Services, Updates, Plugins; never 'This project' or a phrase. A button is a verb for what happens: Stop, Install, Copy link, Pause the plan. A heading names what the reader looks at, and its options finish its sentence: 'Trigger when' / 'A word is written'. Plain literal words: no metaphor or whimsy ('kettle on, waiting'), no app speaking as I, none of the journal's internal words (row, hook, nudge, engine, slate). One word for one thing everywhere, sentence case, as short as it can be while clear. Applies to designers' prototypes, helpers' builds, the viewer's JavaScript lists, feature details, and shipped sequence and trigger titles alike.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "that Bash call returned 155,624 characters, the largest this session \u2014 It stays in the context for good. If you were looking for one thing in it, the next read can be narrower: grep for the line, sed a range, head the file.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 41 \u2014 Keep moving, run the whole suite before every commit, never wait \u2014 The full suite runs in about seven seconds: .venv/bin/python -m pytest -q --timeout=300 -n auto. Run it before every commit instead of picking tests by name. Group rows that sit in the same code into one sitting: write them all, test once, commit once. And never wait, not for a subagent, a build, or an answer you can carry on without. Dispatch it and keep working. If you truly are waiting on something, say so in the work log.; rule 46 \u2014 Only commit and push once the whole journal is proven to boot \u2014 Messages 2178 and 2179. A release that has not been started for real can crash every project that installs it, as 2.78.3 did for Codex and 2.84.0 did to project records. Before every commit and push: the full suite passes, including tests/test_it_boots.py, which installs a packed copy into a fresh project, launches Claude and Codex from it, writes a project record, upgrades again and checks the record survives. When a change touches launching, installing or upgrading, also start a real journal in a scratch project and close it properly afterwards, leaving no process behind.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit \u2014 you've changed 31 judged files since th\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit: you've changed 31 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 you're editing `phone_pages.py`, a test/stub/fixture that `\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 you're editing `phone_pages.py`, a test/stub/fixture that `judge` never scans, so nothing here will flag a symptom-fix. If you're changing it to make a failing check pass, first ask WHERE the failure is born: a failing test usually means the PRODUCTION code is missing behaviour \u2014 a method, a type, a total value on the real type. Fix it THERE (trace to the source; re-open the relevant skill), and change this file only if the TEST itself is wrong. If this is just legitimate test coverage, carry on.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 27 \u2014 Name a declaration with the word a reader already knows \u2014 An attribute, a variable or a field gets the ordinary programming word for what it holds, not an evocative one. was, heard and alone were poetry; aliases, notify_actions and urgent_actions are what they are. The test: could a reader who has never seen this codebase guess what it holds from the name alone? Prose belongs in the help text and the abstract, where it is read as prose. This does not license abbreviations \u2014 a plain word in full, not a short one.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 1 in hand \u2014 Phone chat gaps, pin, delete, piles, terminal, commits \u2014 if this is not what you are doing, end it or park it and start the work you are in", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 45 \u2014 No prose words as names in code - said, says, heard, spoke, told\u2026 \u2014 Messages 1360 and 1698. The user has said more than once that code must not read like prose: a variable, attribute, property or function is named for what it holds or does (text, command, labels, lines), never with a verb from a story. 'says' on the Design type (1360) and 'said = call.said.lower()' in features/recital.py (1698) are the examples. Rule 27 states the naming rule; this one carries the words, so writing one of them whispers it. Before writing a name, ask whether a reader who has never seen the code would know what it holds.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 9 \u2014 Every public method on a controller becomes a journal command \u2014 The CLI is generated from the controllers: each public method of Controller, or of a typed controller, turns into journal <noun> <method>. A helper added to the base class therefore becomes a command on every type \u2014 which is how journal <type> handled and journal <type> refuse came to exist, from the CRUD funnel and the refusal funnel. An internal helper on a controller is named with a leading underscore, as _shaped and _status already are, or it ships as a command nobody meant.; fact 13 \u2014 This live session runs the installed copy in .journal/journal.pyz \u2014 The running journal (server, hooks, CLI) runs from .journal/journal.pyz with its viewer and skills in .journal/src, never from the repo. A change in the repo reaches it only through python3 src/journal.py --root .journal upgrade, which packs the zip again. A commit alone changes nothing that is running.; rule 57 \u2014 Never merge the overnight refactor into main before its pull request\u2026 \u2014 Messages 15005, 15006, 15109, 15110 (2026-10-04): all refactor work goes on branch overnight-refactor and reaches the user as one pull request, which they read in the morning; nothing of it is merged into main until they say so. Hotfixes the user explicitly asks for go to main at once and are merged into the branch.; rule 61 \u2014 Features wait as pull requests until approved; only hotfixes merge\u2026 \u2014 Message 17118 (2026-10-06), after the overnight refactor merged as 2.252.0: start new work in a new branch, do not merge, write the pull request. Every pull request or new feature is parked until the user approves it. Hotfixes can be merged into main immediately (by a dispatched agent in a worktree of main, rule 60).", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 30s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 30s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "law L5 \u2014 Every subagent dispatch names the agent - a human name, a little\u2026 \u2014 A name is how the user and the chat tell subagents apart and how they are messaged later; an id or a task line is not a name. Start the dispatch's description with the name, a colon, then the task, such as \"Dr. Einstein: profile the slow hooks\" or \"Coco Rams: draw the plan card\". A designer can borrow from famous designers, a researcher from famous scientists, mixed up for fun.; rule 56 \u2014 Helpers are for work that writes; subagents read, research and design \u2014 The user, message 13464: there must be a clear distinction. A subagent can be dispatched for anything read-only: research, review, design. A helper is for actual work that writes, best in its own worktree when the work is separate. Dieter designing in Claude Design should have been a subagent, not a helper.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 1 in hand \u2014 Phone chat gaps, pin, delete, piles, terminal, commits \u2014 if this is not what you are doing, end it or park it and start the work you are in", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 52 \u2014 A chat mark for something the user did sits on the user's side \u2014 Message 10960 (2026-09-25): marks for the user's own actions, such as answering a question, are right-aligned like the user's messages. A mark is put there by giving its card side=user.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 33s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 31s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 32 \u2014 The mobile app's pull request may be merged once it is ready \u2014 Messages 17282 and 17283 (2026-10-06): the user gave permission to merge the pull request that builds the phone app's full feature set (to-do 3054) once it is ready, without waiting for approval. Ready means: the phone app can use every feature the desktop viewer has (checked against the design's inventory of desktop places and actions, each one marked done); three critique rounds done (rule 58); built on its own branch; the whole suite and boot guard green; and reviewed by two agents with their findings fixed, as pull request 8 was. This is the user's go for rule 61 for that one pull request only.; rule 48 \u2014 The viewer is built from its component library, and pages only\u2026 \u2014 Message 4258. Every visual piece the viewer shows more than once, or that a user would recognise as the same kind of thing (a dialog, a side panel or inspector, a dropdown, a list row, a switch, a button), is one component in web/src/kit, extracted aggressively, and every page composes those components instead of building its own copy. Before writing markup or styles in a page, look for the kit component that already does it and extend it with a prop; a second hand-built version is a bug. The side panel that animated in but not out, while a separate skill panel did both, is the example.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 60 \u2014 A hotfix is done by a dispatched agent in a worktree of main \u2014 Message 16836 (2026-10-06): the orchestrator cut a worktree under .claude/worktrees for a Codex hotfix, its session moved to a new environment and the user's messages stopped reaching it. The user: when working on a branch and a hotfix comes in, create a worktree of main and dispatch an agent to do that work. The orchestrator stays on its branch and in its environment, and never cds into another checkout.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 36 \u2014 Clean, DRY, idiomatic before it is committed, never after it is\u2026 \u2014 The user should never be the one who finds duplication, dead code, a clumsy name or a pattern the codebase does not use. Read the diff before every commit as a reviewer would, and fix what is not clean then, not in a follow-up after a complaint.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "law L3 \u2014 Read narrowly - grep for the line, sed a range, head the file; never\u2026 \u2014 Everything a tool returns stays in the context for good and is paid for on every turn after it. Search before you read, read the range you need, and cap output with grep, head or tail. Read a whole file only when you need all of it.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your chat talked about the journal's workings - \"nothing else is pending\" \u2014 the user sees replies, reactions, pills and reads themselves; say what the work is instead", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 31s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "waiting: 1 unread todo 1", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "chat etiquette - a line from the journal is an instruction, not a message\u2026 \u2014 a turn that only handles a journal line needs no words: act on it, or say once in the chat what you wait on, then carry on; what the user needs to know still goes to the chat", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the whole suite, queued behind the other helpers on the shared lock came back\u2026", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit \u2014 you've changed 22 judged files since th\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit: you've changed 22 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.; fact 23 \u2014 Every upgrade brings system sequences and their triggers in line\u2026 \u2014 install.py runs ship_sequences after the migrations on each upgrade, so features/sequences/shipped.py is the whole source: change its wording and the next upgrade updates every journal, no migration needed. Shipped rows carry system=True and are read-only for everyone but SYSTEM (controllers/base.py _shipped).; fact 24 \u2014 An answer followed by tool calls can be missing from Claude's\u2026 \u2014 Seen 2026-09-24 for messages 9391-9404: text blocks opening with [!reply:n] that were followed by tool calls never appeared in the session's jsonl (only thinking and tool_use rows did), so the journal never saw them and the replies were lost. When a turn goes on after answering, send the answer with journal message reply <n> \"<text>\" instead of the tag.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 31 \u2014 The overnight branch may be merged once every to-do is done and all\u2026 \u2014 Messages 16886 and 17009 (2026-10-06): the user said to keep working the to-do list on overnight-refactor; when every to-do item is finished and the whole suite is green, the agent may merge the pull request into main, then release a new minor version (message 17008). This is the user's go for rule 57's 'before its pull request is approved'. Until both hold, nothing of the branch goes to main except the hotfixes the user asks for.; fact 33 \u2014 Every open pull request may be merged and released once ready \u2014 The user, messages 17401 and 17402 (2026-10-06): 'see that everything is merged and deployed to main when ready'. Covers pull requests 9 (test coverage), 10 (plugins fit), 11 (voice words for helpers), the suggestion card and phone-parity: each merges once it is rebased on main, reviewed with the findings fixed, and the suite and boot guard pass; then a release goes out.; rule 38 \u2014 Never change the git branch until the user says so, by name \u2014 The work happens on the branch the user named. That was main until message 5929 and question 80 (2026-09-23), which moved the sins work to the branch sins. Do not create, switch to or merge any other branch unless the user names it in their own words.; rule 49 \u2014 A dialog whose content grows keeps one fixed height, and its content\u2026 \u2014 Message 5361, after asking more than once: a dialog that shows output as it arrives (install, update, logs) opens at its final height and never jumps; only its content scrolls.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the log tag does this in one step \u2014 [!log:N] makes the turn itself the log entry; it runs only when it opens the last text of your turn", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "that Bash call returned 184,478 characters, the largest this session \u2014 It stays in the context for good. If you were looking for one thing in it, the next read can be narrower: grep for the line, sed a range, head the file.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up \u2014 you've changed 4 judged files since th\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up: you've changed 4 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.; work 1 is still open \u2014 end it or park it before you stop: journal work end 1 --how \"<what landed>\", or journal work park 1 \"<why it waits>\"", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 41 \u2014 Keep moving, run the whole suite before every commit, never wait \u2014 The full suite runs in about seven seconds: .venv/bin/python -m pytest -q --timeout=300 -n auto. Run it before every commit instead of picking tests by name. Group rows that sit in the same code into one sitting: write them all, test once, commit once. And never wait, not for a subagent, a build, or an answer you can carry on without. Dispatch it and keep working. If you truly are waiting on something, say so in the work log.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your chat talked about the journal's workings - \"Reading them\" \u2014 the user sees replies, reactions, pills and reads themselves; say what the work is instead", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the whole suite on the rebased tree, queued on the shared lock came back - env\u2026", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 27 \u2014 Name a declaration with the word a reader already knows \u2014 An attribute, a variable or a field gets the ordinary programming word for what it holds, not an evocative one. was, heard and alone were poetry; aliases, notify_actions and urgent_actions are what they are. The test: could a reader who has never seen this codebase guess what it holds from the name alone? Prose belongs in the help text and the abstract, where it is read as prose. This does not license abbreviations \u2014 a plain word in full, not a short one.; rule 46 \u2014 Only commit and push once the whole journal is proven to boot \u2014 Messages 2178 and 2179. A release that has not been started for real can crash every project that installs it, as 2.78.3 did for Codex and 2.84.0 did to project records. Before every commit and push: the full suite passes, including tests/test_it_boots.py, which installs a packed copy into a fresh project, launches Claude and Codex from it, writes a project record, upgrades again and checks the record survives. When a change touches launching, installing or upgrading, also start a real journal in a scratch project and close it properly afterwards, leaving no process behind.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 35 \u2014 Write clean code - one funnel per kind of operation, never the same\u2026 \u2014 Every kind of operation has one funnel: one method that creates, one that saves, one that refuses, one that formats. A second method that does the same thing under another name splits the behaviour, and the two drift apart. Before writing a method, search for the one that already does it and extend that. scripts/checks/funnels.py finds bodies written twice.; rule 55 \u2014 Always dispatch Codex helpers on gpt-6-sol \u2014 The user's word, message 13431: switch the codex agents to GPT-6-Sol and make it their default. ~/.codex/config.toml names it as the default model too.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 37 \u2014 Close every to-do explicitly with todo done or a Journal commit\u2026 \u2014 Ending work does not close its row. A to-do is closed by journal todo done <n> --how, or by a commit whose message carries Journal: todos done <n> at column 0, several numbers separated by commas. A row left open after its work landed misleads the next session and auto mode.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 28 \u2014 The designer agent type exists, so design work goes to a subagent \u2014 Since 2026-10-01 .claude/agents/designer.md (Dieter, Opus, Claude Design tools, read-only on the repository) is an agent type; rule 56 says design is a subagent's job, never a helper's.; rule 42 \u2014 Every user-facing text passes the formatters before it leaves the\u2026 \u2014 Not only a brief. A title, an abstract, an outcome and every section body are read by a person, so each goes through the same formatters on its way to the viewer \u2014 chat turns, activity items, to-do rows, inspector pages, docs alike. One field formatted out of five is not a rule, it is an accident, and it is how a raw tag ended up in the activity list after the tags feature had been stripping them for weeks. When a new field carries words a person reads, it joins the list in the same place.; rule 50 \u2014 Everything the user does is doable in the viewer \u2014 Message 6710 (2026-09-23): the user never uses the CLI, only the UI; everything should be doable from the viewer. The journal commands are for agents; any action meant for the user (making boards, confirming, accepting, hosting, watching an agent) needs its place in the viewer.; rule 58 \u2014 A design runs three critique rounds, then is built on a branch \u2014 Messages 17276 and 17281 (2026-10-06): the norm is a three-round cycle. Round by round, the designer designs (or revises), separate critic agents review the design through their lenses (the critic agent type, .claude/agents/critic.md: read-only, with a browser; one per lens, such as first-time, native, words and parity), and the designer adjusts it to their findings; three rounds in all. The three rounds stand in for the user's approval of the design: the user does not approve it. After the third round the design is built on a branch of its own, which ends in a pull request that waits for the user's approval (rule 61). Replaces message 15725's prototype approval.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 59 \u2014 Every viewer heading and label says plainly what it is about \u2014 The user, messages 16499, 16839, 16844, 16989, 16992 and 16993 (2026-10-06), after 'Where the words count', 'Watch for the words in', 'This project', 'This browser' and 'Stop the journal' as tab names: viewer text reads like Linear, GitHub or Vercel. A place (page, tab, group, sidebar item) is a short noun: Settings, Project, Browser, Services, Updates, Plugins; never 'This project' or a phrase. A button is a verb for what happens: Stop, Install, Copy link, Pause the plan. A heading names what the reader looks at, and its options finish its sentence: 'Trigger when' / 'A word is written'. Plain literal words: no metaphor or whimsy ('kettle on, waiting'), no app speaking as I, none of the journal's internal words (row, hook, nudge, engine, slate). One word for one thing everywhere, sentence case, as short as it can be while clear. Applies to designers' prototypes, helpers' builds, the viewer's JavaScript lists, feature details, and shipped sequence and trigger titles alike.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 57 \u2014 Never merge the overnight refactor into main before its pull request\u2026 \u2014 Messages 15005, 15006, 15109, 15110 (2026-10-04): all refactor work goes on branch overnight-refactor and reaches the user as one pull request, which they read in the morning; nothing of it is merged into main until they say so. Hotfixes the user explicitly asks for go to main at once and are merged into the branch.; rule 61 \u2014 Features wait as pull requests until approved; only hotfixes merge\u2026 \u2014 Message 17118 (2026-10-06), after the overnight refactor merged as 2.252.0: start new work in a new branch, do not merge, write the pull request. Every pull request or new feature is parked until the user approves it. Hotfixes can be merged into main immediately (by a dispatched agent in a worktree of main, rule 60).", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 33s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the log tag does this in one step \u2014 [!log:N] makes the turn itself the log entry; it runs only when it opens the last text of your turn", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "fact 13 \u2014 This live session runs the installed copy in .journal/journal.pyz \u2014 The running journal (server, hooks, CLI) runs from .journal/journal.pyz with its viewer and skills in .journal/src, never from the repo. A change in the repo reaches it only through python3 src/journal.py --root .journal upgrade, which packs the zip again. A commit alone changes nothing that is running.; work 2 is still open \u2014 end it or park it before you stop: journal work end 2 --how \"<what landed>\", or journal work park 2 \"<why it waits>\"", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up \u2014 you've changed 10 judged files since t\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up: you've changed 10 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 34s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the whole suite after the wording and top-bar fixes, queued on the shared lock\u2026", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the whole suite for the wording fixes, then Silvio's branch on phone-parity\u2026", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 45 \u2014 No prose words as names in code - said, says, heard, spoke, told\u2026 \u2014 Messages 1360 and 1698. The user has said more than once that code must not read like prose: a variable, attribute, property or function is named for what it holds or does (text, command, labels, lines), never with a verb from a story. 'says' on the Design type (1360) and 'said = call.said.lower()' in features/recital.py (1698) are the examples. Rule 27 states the naming rule; this one carries the words, so writing one of them whispers it. Before writing a name, ask whether a reader who has never seen the code would know what it holds.; rule 54 \u2014 Settings and feature switches are read at boot and on change, never\u2026 \u2014 The user, message 13349: the application boots, determines every feature and setting once, and re-evaluates only when something changes, such as a setting or a plugin. Never lazy-load settings.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 33s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your wait for Silvio's agent pages and the .phone root fix landing on\u2026 \u2014 say journal work await \"<what you wait for>\" again if you are still only waiting", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "rule 51 \u2014 Every finished feature is committed, pushed and released with a new\u2026 \u2014 Message 9207 (2026-09-24): when a new feature is ready, commit, push and publish a new tag. This is the user's standing word for releasing, so rule 44's only-when-the-user-says is met by it for finished features; fixes in between wait for the next feature or a patch the user asks for.; rule 36 \u2014 Clean, DRY, idiomatic before it is committed, never after it is\u2026 \u2014 The user should never be the one who finds duplication, dead code, a clumsy name or a pattern the codebase does not use. Read the diff before every commit as a reviewer would, and fix what is not clean then, not in a follow-up after a complaint.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit \u2014 you've changed 22 judged files since th\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you commit: you've changed 22 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "that Bash call returned 233,971 characters, the largest this session \u2014 It stays in the context for good. If you were looking for one thing in it, the next read can be narrower: grep for the line, sed a range, head the file.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "law L3 \u2014 Read narrowly - grep for the line, sed a range, head the file; never\u2026 \u2014 Everything a tool returns stays in the context for good and is paid for on every turn after it. Search before you read, read the range you need, and cap output with grep, head or tail. Read a whole file only when you need all of it.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up \u2014 you've changed 3 judged files since th\u2026 \u2014 Code Commandments \u2014 before you wrap up: you've changed 3 judged files since the last commit. Consider running `commandments judge --changes` to confirm they conform, and fix any sin at its SOURCE (don't launder a finding with a default/cast/null-check). This is a one-time nudge for this batch \u2014 if you've already judged, or these changes aren't worth a scan, just say so and carry on.; work 2 is still open \u2014 end it or park it before you stop: journal work end 2 --how \"<what landed>\", or journal work park 2 \"<why it waits>\"", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "your command ran 30s in the foreground and was moved to the background \u2014 carry on with other work; you are told when it ends. Start a command you expect to take long in the background yourself", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "work 2 is still open \u2014 end it or park it before you stop: journal work end 2 --how \"<what landed>\", or journal work park 2 \"<why it waits>\"", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the whole suite on the merged terminal page, queued on the shared lock came\u2026", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}
{"content": "the end tag does this in one step \u2014 [!end:N] makes the turn itself what landed; it runs only when it opens the last text of your turn; rule 56 \u2014 Helpers are for work that writes; subagents read, research and design \u2014 The user, message 13464: there must be a clear distinction. A subagent can be dispatched for anything read-only: research, review, design. A helper is for actual work that writes, best in its own worktree when the work is separate. Dieter designing in Claude Design should have been a subagent, not a helper.", "meta": {"from": "journal"}}