{"session": "f8e8a5d5-c2d2-4871-aa90-c5f334a475a2", "env": "main-monsieur-lumiere", "command": "journal helper report \"Alfred, I ran the seven new rows once; your branch is not taken yet, so no row has said what it will after the merge. 38 checks_run, 39 loads_in_loops and 40 polls each fail with Python's plain 'can't open file .../scripts/checks/<name>.py: No such file' (exit 2), because the scripts are on my branch only. This is not the 'cannot run' wording I predicted: the journal runs from the installed .journal/journal.pyz (fact 13), which has not been upgraded, so the missing-script guard is not live yet and the old failure shows. The 'cannot run' wording only appears after an upgrade, so check it then. 41 feature_shape fails with its 7 known findings, 42 one_controller with its 5, and 43 prose_names with its backlog; all three scripts exist on main, so they ran as expected and are in to-do 4309. 44 pulls fails, and this one is new: it reports pull request #23 by BjarneDms, 'Cover cold\u2026', waiting with no answer from you, which no one had read before. Its brief already says to read the diff first and never run the code. I am starting to-do 4311 now. I will run 38 to 40 again after the merge and the upgrade.\" 2>&1 | tail -1; journal work end 2 --how \"seven rows run once; reported\" 2>&1 | tail -1; journal todo start 4311 2>&1 | tail -2", "parts": ["journal helper report \"Alfred, I ran the seven new rows once; your branch is not taken yet, so no row has said what it will after the merge. 38 checks_run, 39 loads_in_loops and 40 polls each fail with Python's plain 'can't open file .../scripts/checks/<name>.py: No such file' (exit 2), because the scripts are on my branch only. This is not the 'cannot run' wording I predicted: the journal runs from the installed .journal/journal.pyz (fact 13), which has not been upgraded, so the missing-script guard is not live yet and the old failure shows. The 'cannot run' wording only appears after an upgrade, so check it then. 41 feature_shape fails with its 7 known findings, 42 one_controller with its 5, and 43 prose_names with its backlog; all three scripts exist on main, so they ran as expected and are in to-do 4309. 44 pulls fails, and this one is new: it reports pull request #23 by BjarneDms, 'Cover cold\u2026', waiting with no answer from you, which no one had read before. Its brief already says to read the diff first and never run the code. I am starting to-do 4311 now. I will run 38 to 40 again after the merge and the upgrade.\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal work end 2 --how \"seven rows run once; reported\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal todo start 4311 2>&1 | tail -2"]}