{"session": "28585272-a6c8-4e89-9ca9-459772bc64e0", "env": "main-hedy-lockwell", "command": "cd /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal && journal work end 160 --how \"release-2690 already has the equivalent fix (heal --died); no second commit\" | head -1; journal helper report \"Alfred: I made no second commit for release-2690, because release-2690 (8ad4a19b5) already holds the same fix in another shape, from 55256718b: agents/terminal.py gives the supervisor the heal command journal heal --died, and engine/heal.py has healed_after_death(), which rolls back although the build's server answers (heal() keeps the answering check for an agent's own ask). That is why 47e47b203 conflicts in parser.py, queries.py, heal.py and the auto_update test: two implementations of one rule. The difference in behaviour: 2690 rolls back on the first worker that dies at start; mine on the second in a row (so one quick death under load is not a rollback). Your call. Options: (a) leave 2690 as it is and accept that merging 2690 into main will conflict in those four files, resolved by taking 2690's side and dropping my supervisor.py counter (the merge needs me or you to drop 47e47b203's --repeated, QUICK_DEATHS and the test lines); (b) put 2690's --died on main now instead of my --repeated, so the two branches agree; tell me and I will cut that commit from main. I did not run any tests.\" | head -1", "parts": ["cd /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal", "journal work end 160 --how \"release-2690 already has the equivalent fix (heal --died); no second commit\" | head -1", "journal helper report \"Alfred: I made no second commit for release-2690, because release-2690 (8ad4a19b5) already holds the same fix in another shape, from 55256718b: agents/terminal.py gives the supervisor the heal command journal heal --died, and engine/heal.py has healed_after_death(), which rolls back although the build's server answers (heal() keeps the answering check for an agent's own ask). That is why 47e47b203 conflicts in parser.py, queries.py, heal.py and the auto_update test: two implementations of one rule. The difference in behaviour: 2690 rolls back on the first worker that dies at start; mine on the second in a row (so one quick death under load is not a rollback). Your call. Options: (a) leave 2690 as it is and accept that merging 2690 into main will conflict in those four files, resolved by taking 2690's side and dropping my supervisor.py counter (the merge needs me or you to drop 47e47b203's --repeated, QUICK_DEATHS and the test lines); (b) put 2690's --died on main now instead of my --repeated, so the two branches agree; tell me and I will cut that commit from main. I did not run any tests.\" | head -1"]}