{"session": "28585272-a6c8-4e89-9ca9-459772bc64e0", "env": "main-hedy-lockwell", "command": "cd /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal && journal helper done 3939 \"A conversation started again in a new process is not stopped before it has reported; branch long-move 215aaf085\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal work end 104 --how \"3939 on long-move, agent_sessions and git_actions passed\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal helper report \"Alfred: 3939 is done on branch long-move (215aaf085, on top of 3936), tests: agent_sessions and git_actions, 13 passed. What I found in transportklok's record: the new session did take its row. Row 020 (148ee05a) is the conversation resumed, its session record now holds the new process 94238, and it is reporting; row 024 claude-94238 is only the launch placeholder (created stopped, as every launch row is) and does nothing wrong. The upgrade did stop a row whose conversation was alive again: stop_ended, and the quiet-minute liveness stop, judge a session ended by the pid in its record alone, and a conversation started again in a new process keeps the dead old pid until the new process's first hook rebinds it (agents/seat.py relaunched). A row stopped in that window shows Idle until that first hook. Now a row is not stopped while a newer live process of the same provider holds its environment and has no row of its own yet (features/agent_sessions/handlers.py relaunching); once the new process has reported, the old row of a gone session is stopped as before. I could not watch the window itself, so the exact timing is inferred from the code and the record. Test: two assertions in src/features/agent_sessions/test.py (not stopped before the successor reported, stopped after). Also in this branch, from the earlier commandments finding: report_step takes its token as a required argument (runner/stepping.py), callers in git_actions/test.py updated.\" 2>&1|tail -1", "parts": ["cd /Users/jessegall/projects/agent-journal", "journal helper done 3939 \"A conversation started again in a new process is not stopped before it has reported; branch long-move 215aaf085\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal work end 104 --how \"3939 on long-move, agent_sessions and git_actions passed\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal helper report \"Alfred: 3939 is done on branch long-move (215aaf085, on top of 3936), tests: agent_sessions and git_actions, 13 passed. What I found in transportklok's record: the new session did take its row. Row 020 (148ee05a) is the conversation resumed, its session record now holds the new process 94238, and it is reporting; row 024 claude-94238 is only the launch placeholder (created stopped, as every launch row is) and does nothing wrong. The upgrade did stop a row whose conversation was alive again: stop_ended, and the quiet-minute liveness stop, judge a session ended by the pid in its record alone, and a conversation started again in a new process keeps the dead old pid until the new process's first hook rebinds it (agents/seat.py relaunched). A row stopped in that window shows Idle until that first hook. Now a row is not stopped while a newer live process of the same provider holds its environment and has no row of its own yet (features/agent_sessions/handlers.py relaunching); once the new process has reported, the old row of a gone session is stopped as before. I could not watch the window itself, so the exact timing is inferred from the code and the record. Test: two assertions in src/features/agent_sessions/test.py (not stopped before the successor reported, stopped after). Also in this branch, from the earlier commandments finding: report_step takes its token as a required argument (runner/stepping.py), callers in git_actions/test.py updated.\" 2>&1|tail -1"]}