{"session": "ae4d5770-7617-4c2d-be1e-123543cc7126", "env": "main-coco-runwright", "command": "git fetch -q origin && git rebase origin/main 2>&1 | tail -1; journal helper report \"To-do 3997 is done, commit 421be77c6 on retry-leftover. Cause of the raw tag in the chat: the pattern that takes tags out of a turn (reading.py ARGUMENT) accepted one number after the colon, while the runner's pattern (CARRIED) accepts a comma list, so a refused or failed [!reply:24398,24399,24400] was never stripped. Now both read the same list, so every tag leaves the text whether it ran, was refused or failed. Test: a visible() assertion in command_tags/test.py; command_tags and messages tests ran once, 20 passed. The 'already answered in comment N' check (controllers/messages.py _unanswerable) is correct as written: it fires when the agent already has a comment on that message, so a fresh message is only refused if its reply already ran once. I could not reproduce a fresh reply being refused; most likely the same turn's reply ran twice, the same repeat as to-do 3989. I did not verify that.\"", "parts": ["git fetch -q origin", "git rebase origin/main 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal helper report \"To-do 3997 is done, commit 421be77c6 on retry-leftover. Cause of the raw tag in the chat: the pattern that takes tags out of a turn (reading.py ARGUMENT) accepted one number after the colon, while the runner's pattern (CARRIED) accepts a comma list, so a refused or failed [!reply:24398,24399,24400] was never stripped. Now both read the same list, so every tag leaves the text whether it ran, was refused or failed. Test: a visible() assertion in command_tags/test.py; command_tags and messages tests ran once, 20 passed. The 'already answered in comment N' check (controllers/messages.py _unanswerable) is correct as written: it fires when the agent already has a comment on that message, so a fresh message is only refused if its reply already ran once. I could not reproduce a fresh reply being refused; most likely the same turn's reply ran twice, the same repeat as to-do 3989. I did not verify that.\""]}