{"session": "8761b1fd-7c24-4c0d-ada1-345c90852a5c", "env": "main-coco-runwright", "command": "journal helper done 3810 \"a shared plan shows skeleton rows and a skeleton timeline until its to-dos have arrived in the share (share-plan-skeleton db9093053)\" 2>&1 | tail -1; journal helper report \"Alfred: to-do 3810 is on branch share-plan-skeleton, tip db9093053 (cut from main at 2.267.44; rebase if needed). One thing to know first: the share's data.json is a single reply, and in a scratch share the plan's to-dos arrived together with the plan, so on the reply the report describes I could not see the pop-in. I made the guard for the case where a reply carries the plan without its to-dos. ShareApp counts replies; until the second one, a plan whose phases name to-dos not yet in the share shows skeleton rows in its phase list (PlanPage 'holding' feeds the existing per-phase skeleton) and a skeleton timeline in the aside, never an empty list. After the second reply a to-do that is truly absent (deleted) just stays out, so nothing skeletons forever. Checked in a scratch share with a first reply stripped of its to-dos: it showed 3 skeleton rows and the timeline skeleton, then the to-do after the next poll; screenshot .playwright-mcp/share-plan-holding.png. Tests, only these: the shared-page browser scenarios (new scenario, with the fixture's plan given a to-do), 1 passed. If Transportklok still sees the pop-in on a full reply, send me the share link's data.json and I will find which part arrives late. Next: to-dos 3808/3809 (fixed in the run-cards checkout, tests pass) and 3804 (selector scenario passes).\" 2>&1 | tail -1; journal work end 33 --how \"to-do 3810 done on share-plan-skeleton db9093053\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "parts": ["journal helper done 3810 \"a shared plan shows skeleton rows and a skeleton timeline until its to-dos have arrived in the share (share-plan-skeleton db9093053)\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal helper report \"Alfred: to-do 3810 is on branch share-plan-skeleton, tip db9093053 (cut from main at 2.267.44; rebase if needed). One thing to know first: the share's data.json is a single reply, and in a scratch share the plan's to-dos arrived together with the plan, so on the reply the report describes I could not see the pop-in. I made the guard for the case where a reply carries the plan without its to-dos. ShareApp counts replies; until the second one, a plan whose phases name to-dos not yet in the share shows skeleton rows in its phase list (PlanPage 'holding' feeds the existing per-phase skeleton) and a skeleton timeline in the aside, never an empty list. After the second reply a to-do that is truly absent (deleted) just stays out, so nothing skeletons forever. Checked in a scratch share with a first reply stripped of its to-dos: it showed 3 skeleton rows and the timeline skeleton, then the to-do after the next poll; screenshot .playwright-mcp/share-plan-holding.png. Tests, only these: the shared-page browser scenarios (new scenario, with the fixture's plan given a to-do), 1 passed. If Transportklok still sees the pop-in on a full reply, send me the share link's data.json and I will find which part arrives late. Next: to-dos 3808/3809 (fixed in the run-cards checkout, tests pass) and 3804 (selector scenario passes).\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal work end 33 --how \"to-do 3810 done on share-plan-skeleton db9093053\" 2>&1 | tail -1"]}