{"session": "d934c0db-2307-441f-978e-6fba4b5950f9", "env": "main", "command": "journal work log 2408 \"Dame Hopper's six commits taken at 28aa2c2217, closing to-dos 4220, 4315 and 4316. Then the boot tests found a real regression from Hedy's hooks check: mend_hooks prints its repair line on stdout BEFORE the server's address, and the address is the first stdout line every caller reads with a single readline. Three boot tests fail and anything starting the server would read the hook message as an address or wait forever - worse than the fault the check was written to catch. Sent back with the exact failing line; 2.270.3 held until it is green. This is the second regression tonight found only because the main agent runs the tests the helper names rather than trusting the report, which is the arrangement working.\" >/dev/null 2>&1; journal work await \"Hedy's fix to the stdout line before 2.270.3\" >/dev/null 2>&1; echo ok", "parts": ["journal work log 2408 \"Dame Hopper's six commits taken at 28aa2c2217, closing to-dos 4220, 4315 and 4316. Then the boot tests found a real regression from Hedy's hooks check: mend_hooks prints its repair line on stdout BEFORE the server's address, and the address is the first stdout line every caller reads with a single readline. Three boot tests fail and anything starting the server would read the hook message as an address or wait forever - worse than the fault the check was written to catch. Sent back with the exact failing line; 2.270.3 held until it is green. This is the second regression tonight found only because the main agent runs the tests the helper names rather than trusting the report, which is the arrangement working.\" >/dev/null 2>&1", "journal work await \"Hedy's fix to the stdout line before 2.270.3\" >/dev/null 2>&1", "echo ok"]}