{"session": "d934c0db-2307-441f-978e-6fba4b5950f9", "env": "main", "command": "journal helper say 230 \"Coco \u2014 that is the answer, and it explains every observation we had. Build it.\n\nYour finding fits all four facts that had us stuck: why only two engines are heavy (the handler returns early for an agent younger than an hour, so ticket-61 skips it), why a replay in process cost only 0.82 percent (no hour-old agent, so the handler never ran), why file size alone did not reproduce it, and why it only happens with a live terminal and live writers. Nobody could have named it from outside the process; your hook earned itself in one run.\n\nBuild the fix you propose, on a branch cut from main, with its test in src/features/plugins/test.py: decide once per fresh offers file, again after FRESH_FOR, and not at all while a run is still going. The last clause is the one that matters most - a run that takes longer than a tick must never be started again on top of itself, whatever else is decided. Report the sha and the measured CPU of the two engines after it, by cputime deltas over a window, so we close 4236 on a number rather than on a reading.\n\nAnd file nothing about the stale stack paths yourself; I am filing that. It is worth knowing you saw it: stacks pointing into journal-2.267.44-57a5a256bb.pyz while the engine reports 2.269.13 means a process is running code from an old build, which is its own fault and possibly a serious one.\" 2>&1 | tail -1; journal todo create \"An engine runs the code of the build it reports, not an older pyz\" --brief \"Seen by Coco Runwright, 2026-10-11, while profiling transportklok's engines on 2.269.13: the sampled stack paths for fitting.py and worktree.py point into journal-2.267.44-57a5a256bb.pyz, although the engine reports 2.269.13. So a running process is executing code from a build seven versions old, at least for those modules. That would mean a fix can be released, installed and still not reach a running engine, which is worse than slow: it is a journal that lies about what it is running. Find how a module from an older pyz stays on an engine's import path - a sys.path entry kept across a restart, a pyz not removed on upgrade, a module imported before the swap - and fix it where the path is built.\" --set priority=high 2>&1 | tail -1", "parts": ["journal helper say 230 \"Coco \u2014 that is the answer, and it explains every observation we had. Build it.\n\nYour finding fits all four facts that had us stuck: why only two engines are heavy (the handler returns early for an agent younger than an hour, so ticket-61 skips it), why a replay in process cost only 0.82 percent (no hour-old agent, so the handler never ran), why file size alone did not reproduce it, and why it only happens with a live terminal and live writers. Nobody could have named it from outside the process; your hook earned itself in one run.\n\nBuild the fix you propose, on a branch cut from main, with its test in src/features/plugins/test.py: decide once per fresh offers file, again after FRESH_FOR, and not at all while a run is still going. The last clause is the one that matters most - a run that takes longer than a tick must never be started again on top of itself, whatever else is decided. Report the sha and the measured CPU of the two engines after it, by cputime deltas over a window, so we close 4236 on a number rather than on a reading.\n\nAnd file nothing about the stale stack paths yourself; I am filing that. It is worth knowing you saw it: stacks pointing into journal-2.267.44-57a5a256bb.pyz while the engine reports 2.269.13 means a process is running code from an old build, which is its own fault and possibly a serious one.\" 2>&1 | tail -1", "journal todo create \"An engine runs the code of the build it reports, not an older pyz\" --brief \"Seen by Coco Runwright, 2026-10-11, while profiling transportklok's engines on 2.269.13: the sampled stack paths for fitting.py and worktree.py point into journal-2.267.44-57a5a256bb.pyz, although the engine reports 2.269.13. So a running process is executing code from a build seven versions old, at least for those modules. That would mean a fix can be released, installed and still not reach a running engine, which is worse than slow: it is a journal that lies about what it is running. Find how a module from an older pyz stays on an engine's import path - a sys.path entry kept across a restart, a pyz not removed on upgrade, a module imported before the swap - and fix it where the path is built.\" --set priority=high 2>&1 | tail -1"]}