{"session": "37f25627-4fff-4ce7-bca6-2634f6ebae45", "env": "main-dame-hopper", "command": "m=\"the machine, from the log's evidence: at load 72 (a viewer build)\"; journal helper done 4321 \"closed, $m: 18ms working, the rest lock wait; every read-all row in budget.jsonl peaks at 19ms working. The lock poll is also shorter since the commit that backs off the file lock retry.\" | tail -1; journal helper done 4322 \"closed, $m: 127ms working; the same dashboard is 5, 9, 12 and 5ms working in the four rows taken at load under 20 on 2.270.2 (median 16 over 53 rows, only three over 90, all at high load). One load-inflated reading, not a code path.\" | tail -1; journal helper done 4323 \"closed, $m: 64ms working with 474ms after the answer; the 9 rows for POST /api/main/message peak at 64ms and have a median of 26ms working. The after time is the composed after-chain, which the status bar change shortens; I did not profile it.\" | tail -1; journal helper done 4325 \"closed, $m: 12ms working, 91ms lock wait; the 3 rows of todo start peak at 26ms working.\" | tail -1; journal helper report \"Alfred: my previous report may not have reached you (the command timed out after 20 seconds at load 57, so check): four commits on my branch, tip 4fa499b09, rebased on main: 4289 status bar write through bus.spaced, 4286 request numbers and spans on budget rows, 4281 lock retry that starts at 1ms and doubles to 50ms (a 10ms hold: 54ms before, 16ms after, median of 8 at load about 50), with assertions in src/features/status_bar/test.py and src/features/dev_faults/test.py, nothing run. Not measured: the hook chain's CPU for 4289. 4321, 4322, 4323 and 4325 closed on the log: working 18, 127, 64 and 12ms at load 72, 72, 72 and 59, lock wait and after time for the rest; the dashboard's four rows at load under 20 are 5 to 12ms, so 4322 is one load-inflated reading, not the real one of the three as you guessed. 4323's 474ms after the answer I did not profile; the bar change should shorten it.\" | tail -1", "parts": ["m=\"the machine, from the log's evidence: at load 72 (a viewer build)\"", "journal helper done 4321 \"closed, $m: 18ms working, the rest lock wait; every read-all row in budget.jsonl peaks at 19ms working. The lock poll is also shorter since the commit that backs off the file lock retry.\" | tail -1", "journal helper done 4322 \"closed, $m: 127ms working; the same dashboard is 5, 9, 12 and 5ms working in the four rows taken at load under 20 on 2.270.2 (median 16 over 53 rows, only three over 90, all at high load). One load-inflated reading, not a code path.\" | tail -1", "journal helper done 4323 \"closed, $m: 64ms working with 474ms after the answer; the 9 rows for POST /api/main/message peak at 64ms and have a median of 26ms working. The after time is the composed after-chain, which the status bar change shortens; I did not profile it.\" | tail -1", "journal helper done 4325 \"closed, $m: 12ms working, 91ms lock wait; the 3 rows of todo start peak at 26ms working.\" | tail -1", "journal helper report \"Alfred: my previous report may not have reached you (the command timed out after 20 seconds at load 57, so check): four commits on my branch, tip 4fa499b09, rebased on main: 4289 status bar write through bus.spaced, 4286 request numbers and spans on budget rows, 4281 lock retry that starts at 1ms and doubles to 50ms (a 10ms hold: 54ms before, 16ms after, median of 8 at load about 50), with assertions in src/features/status_bar/test.py and src/features/dev_faults/test.py, nothing run. Not measured: the hook chain's CPU for 4289. 4321, 4322, 4323 and 4325 closed on the log: working 18, 127, 64 and 12ms at load 72, 72, 72 and 59, lock wait and after time for the rest; the dashboard's four rows at load under 20 are 5 to 12ms, so 4322 is one load-inflated reading, not the real one of the three as you guessed. 4323's 474ms after the answer I did not profile; the bar change should shorten it.\" | tail -1"]}