{"session": "f8e8a5d5-c2d2-4871-aa90-c5f334a475a2", "env": "main-monsieur-lumiere", "command": "journal helper done 4294 \"missing-script guard in checks controller, polls.py check\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal helper done 4295 \"all five wired plus checks_run.py\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal helper done 4293 \"all eight peek, 8 more found, loads_in_loops.py guard\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal work end 1 --how \"committed c37bcba8a\" 2>&1|tail -1; journal todo done 1 --how \"committed c37bcba8a: missing-script guard, five scripts wired, load-in-loop peeks and guard\" 2>&1|tail -1\njournal helper report \"Alfred, all three rows are committed in c37bcba8a on helper-main-monsieur-lumiere, already on top of main. I ran none of the suites or the checks. The only runs were the new scripts, standalone, to calibrate them.\n4294: Check runner (src/features/checks/controller.py _ran) now checks that a script named in a command (.py/.sh) exists before running. If it is missing, the run is recorded as failed with code 127 and the output 'check N cannot run: its script <path> is not there, so the check is at fault, not the code it guards'. Because it fails, it is still filed and told like any other failure. I extended the first test in src/features/checks/test.py instead of adding one (the feature is at its cap of 10): test_a_check_runs_its_command_and_a_failure_is_filed_until_it_passes. The poll rule is rewritten as scripts/checks/polls.py. It reads EVERY constants and every: values under src/web/src and refuses anything under 1000 ms, with no test-file dependency. It has two allow-list entries with reasons, both worth your look: chat/AgentScreen.vue 400 ms (live terminal screen) and sync/polled.js BUSY_EVERY 500 ms (event poll while the agent works). Drop either entry if you want them refused.\n4295, a decision per script. one_client: I found it already run by checks 2 and 37, so nothing to do. feature_shape (7 findings, real structural fixes) and one_controller (5 findings: routes like /api/slow-command, /api/step, /api/new-feature, /api/update/cancel, /api/sync/hello that no controller method uses): wired as daily check rows, but they are red until fixed. I did not fix them: each is a refactor of its own, so file them. pulls: wired every 15 minutes like issues.py. It needs gh and it fails while a pull request waits. prose_names: its 477 findings are real, not mis-calibrated. A sample of ~7 across files were real uses of shown/said/told/heard as names. 239 are in test.py files, 46 in web/. Fixing them is a mass rename I left alone. Wired daily, so it is red until the backlog is renamed or you retire the row. New guard scripts/checks/checks_run.py (daily) fails when a script in scripts/checks is named by no check row, or a row names a script that is not there (it calls journal check all/show). The seven new rows are numbered after 37. The scripts exist only on this branch, so until it merges the rows will report 'cannot run'. That is the new guard working.\n4293: I read all eight sites and none mutates the loaded row (update_run, without, reopen and update build new values or go by n), so all eight now peek. The guard found 13 more: I peeked 10 (controllers/files.py _attached, controllers/nudges.py, boards/requests.py, form_of_address samples/schedules/animations, phone/feed.py x2, sequences/handlers.py x2) and allowed 3 with reasons: controllers/base.py unread and links.py linked_to, which return copies to the caller, and form_of_address ship, which sets fields and saves. The guard is scripts/checks/loads_in_loops.py, run daily as a check row. It refuses .load(row['n']) inside a loop or comprehension under src/. I did not widen it to every load-in-loop (about 55 hits, mostly not from summaries). Tests: no new test file, as scripts carry none. The calls to run are the extended test in src/features/checks/test.py, plus the generated runs, since peek touches many readers.\" 2>&1 | tail -2", "parts": ["journal helper done 4294 \"missing-script guard in checks controller, polls.py check\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal helper done 4295 \"all five wired plus checks_run.py\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal helper done 4293 \"all eight peek, 8 more found, loads_in_loops.py guard\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal work end 1 --how \"committed c37bcba8a\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal todo done 1 --how \"committed c37bcba8a: missing-script guard, five scripts wired, load-in-loop peeks and guard\" 2>&1|tail -1", "journal helper report \"Alfred, all three rows are committed in c37bcba8a on helper-main-monsieur-lumiere, already on top of main. I ran none of the suites or the checks. The only runs were the new scripts, standalone, to calibrate them.\n4294: Check runner (src/features/checks/controller.py _ran) now checks that a script named in a command (.py/.sh) exists before running. If it is missing, the run is recorded as failed with code 127 and the output 'check N cannot run: its script <path> is not there, so the check is at fault, not the code it guards'. Because it fails, it is still filed and told like any other failure. I extended the first test in src/features/checks/test.py instead of adding one (the feature is at its cap of 10): test_a_check_runs_its_command_and_a_failure_is_filed_until_it_passes. The poll rule is rewritten as scripts/checks/polls.py. It reads EVERY constants and every: values under src/web/src and refuses anything under 1000 ms, with no test-file dependency. It has two allow-list entries with reasons, both worth your look: chat/AgentScreen.vue 400 ms (live terminal screen) and sync/polled.js BUSY_EVERY 500 ms (event poll while the agent works). Drop either entry if you want them refused.\n4295, a decision per script. one_client: I found it already run by checks 2 and 37, so nothing to do. feature_shape (7 findings, real structural fixes) and one_controller (5 findings: routes like /api/slow-command, /api/step, /api/new-feature, /api/update/cancel, /api/sync/hello that no controller method uses): wired as daily check rows, but they are red until fixed. I did not fix them: each is a refactor of its own, so file them. pulls: wired every 15 minutes like issues.py. It needs gh and it fails while a pull request waits. prose_names: its 477 findings are real, not mis-calibrated. A sample of ~7 across files were real uses of shown/said/told/heard as names. 239 are in test.py files, 46 in web/. Fixing them is a mass rename I left alone. Wired daily, so it is red until the backlog is renamed or you retire the row. New guard scripts/checks/checks_run.py (daily) fails when a script in scripts/checks is named by no check row, or a row names a script that is not there (it calls journal check all/show). The seven new rows are numbered after 37. The scripts exist only on this branch, so until it merges the rows will report 'cannot run'. That is the new guard working.\n4293: I read all eight sites and none mutates the loaded row (update_run, without, reopen and update build new values or go by n), so all eight now peek. The guard found 13 more: I peeked 10 (controllers/files.py _attached, controllers/nudges.py, boards/requests.py, form_of_address samples/schedules/animations, phone/feed.py x2, sequences/handlers.py x2) and allowed 3 with reasons: controllers/base.py unread and links.py linked_to, which return copies to the caller, and form_of_address ship, which sets fields and saves. The guard is scripts/checks/loads_in_loops.py, run daily as a check row. It refuses .load(row['n']) inside a loop or comprehension under src/. I did not widen it to every load-in-loop (about 55 hits, mostly not from summaries). Tests: no new test file, as scripts carry none. The calls to run are the extended test in src/features/checks/test.py, plus the generated runs, since peek touches many readers.\" 2>&1 | tail -2"]}