{"session": "ae4d5770-7617-4c2d-be1e-123543cc7126", "env": "main-coco-runwright", "command": "journal helper report \"The last 15 of 2.269.0, branch coco-269 cut from release-2690 bd6eda5ca: 5a29b15c4 and 0ffe2c519. I ran no tests. 1) agentcells and boot: my main fixes ported (5a29b15c4; the statusLine commit was already in the release, Ada's, so it is skipped): agentcells reads the cell's .aw-name (Ticket 2, 5, 9) and boot runs the page clock for the 60 s warning. 2) phoneapp dump ('Files \u00b7 0 of 3 done' never shows): the screenshot shows the send failed with 'the journal did not answer' and the dump never started, and the same release-only change is the likely cause of it and of the phoneapp agent failure: MY 4091 change, which is in release-2690 and not in main: RowStore.peek and summaries wait up to 2 s for a write in progress on their repository from another thread; a thread that holds a repository lock itself and reads a row of an environment under write waits for a write that may be waiting for that very lock (a dump creation, an upload, a phone call under the project lock), 2 s for each read, and the request outlives what the phone's proxy waits (502). Fix (0ffe2c519, src/engine/locks.py): a thread that holds a repository lock never waits for another thread's write (a per-thread depth set by writing_to). Test: the lines added to test_a_write_locks_its_repository_for_a_moment_a_read_waits_for_it_without_locking_and_a_lock_held_too_long_is_given_up in src/features/put_off_work/test.py (a read made inside a lock of its own does not wait for another write). I did not reproduce the dump failure with a server; I reproduced that Dumps.create itself works in-process, and the cause is argued from the code, so if dump or agent still fail after this, the first error of agent.mjs is no longer hidden (the catch I ported) and will name the step. 3) clean_slate quick-end test: queries.ended also runs kept_work(Path.cwd()), which asks git about the checkout: with SLOW_AFTER at 0.3 s a loaded machine makes that call slow and the stack is written. The test now replaces kept_work with a no-op (0ffe2c519, src/features/clean_slate/test.py), so it times only put_back.\" 2>&1 | tail -1 | cut -c1-50; journal work end 110 --how \"coco-269 5a29b15c4, 0ffe2c519\" 2>&1 | tail -1 | cut -c1-40", "parts": ["journal helper report \"The last 15 of 2.269.0, branch coco-269 cut from release-2690 bd6eda5ca: 5a29b15c4 and 0ffe2c519. I ran no tests. 1) agentcells and boot: my main fixes ported (5a29b15c4; the statusLine commit was already in the release, Ada's, so it is skipped): agentcells reads the cell's .aw-name (Ticket 2, 5, 9) and boot runs the page clock for the 60 s warning. 2) phoneapp dump ('Files \u00b7 0 of 3 done' never shows): the screenshot shows the send failed with 'the journal did not answer' and the dump never started, and the same release-only change is the likely cause of it and of the phoneapp agent failure: MY 4091 change, which is in release-2690 and not in main: RowStore.peek and summaries wait up to 2 s for a write in progress on their repository from another thread; a thread that holds a repository lock itself and reads a row of an environment under write waits for a write that may be waiting for that very lock (a dump creation, an upload, a phone call under the project lock), 2 s for each read, and the request outlives what the phone's proxy waits (502). Fix (0ffe2c519, src/engine/locks.py): a thread that holds a repository lock never waits for another thread's write (a per-thread depth set by writing_to). Test: the lines added to test_a_write_locks_its_repository_for_a_moment_a_read_waits_for_it_without_locking_and_a_lock_held_too_long_is_given_up in src/features/put_off_work/test.py (a read made inside a lock of its own does not wait for another write). I did not reproduce the dump failure with a server; I reproduced that Dumps.create itself works in-process, and the cause is argued from the code, so if dump or agent still fail after this, the first error of agent.mjs is no longer hidden (the catch I ported) and will name the step. 3) clean_slate quick-end test: queries.ended also runs kept_work(Path.cwd()), which asks git about the checkout: with SLOW_AFTER at 0.3 s a loaded machine makes that call slow and the stack is written. The test now replaces kept_work with a no-op (0ffe2c519, src/features/clean_slate/test.py), so it times only put_back.\" 2>&1 | tail -1 | cut -c1-50", "journal work end 110 --how \"coco-269 5a29b15c4, 0ffe2c519\" 2>&1 | tail -1 | cut -c1-40"]}